6 Comments
тна Return to thread

Glad you are interested in the science.

Why don't you pick one topic you think is important and we can look at the facts.

Expand full comment

Primarily because I'm not terribly interested in going over anything with a person who believes in the science rather than in following the scientific method. That is one of the main problems of our time. Science is a process by which we ascertain things, not a thing unto itself to be revered dogmatically.

Well, since hope springs eternal, let's try it. Lets start at the beginning- the jab contents stay local to the injection site. That was one of the first claims made. Do they? Nope. Could we have known this before jabbing billions of people? Yes. Not only could we have known, we did know. How? We fully understood the biodistribution of the lipid nanoparticles. In fact, that was the reason behind their invention in the first place. Am I wrong about this?

Expand full comment

So that would be a big old no....you can't provide even one example of a scientists saying what you claim!

Expand full comment

I'm sorry. Must have missed the earlier comment from you. Bad notifications i guess. Here is a presentation to the MA state legislature. Several MDs, PHDs, and at least one person with both state this directly. And just to clarify for the viewer , they are stating that due to being wrapped up in an lnp, the injection payload goes everywhere throughout the body.

https://rumble.com/v48l6rr-covid-19-vaccine-expert-panel-briefing-to-the-massachusetts-legislature-and.html

But hey congratulations on your premature.. umm... celebration.

Expand full comment

Thanks, it is more than 3 hours long.....could you please direct me to the relevant time points?

Expand full comment

Thanks, I still have hope too.

"Lets start at the beginning- the jab contents stay local to the injection site. "

Great, now please provide an example of scientists saying that.

Thanks,

Expand full comment