lol thats not how this works - how do you know hopping on one leg is ineffective for cancer? the people pushing jabs have to show they are safe and effective, not the other way round.
and if you think they have done that in anything like good faith I invite you to google the stories of maddie de garay, brianne dressen and augusto roux - a…
lol thats not how this works - how do you know hopping on one leg is ineffective for cancer? the people pushing jabs have to show they are safe and effective, not the other way round.
and if you think they have done that in anything like good faith I invite you to google the stories of maddie de garay, brianne dressen and augusto roux - all of whom were trial participants with very severe AEs that pharma / FDA simply dismissed.
maddie de garay, a 12 year old kid, was put in a wheelchair for life by a condition that came on out of nowhere immediately after her jab - but the people running the trial simply asserted it wasn't related to the jab, so there's no problem. remember this is the trial to determine the effects of the jab. it's that easy for them.
Over years, basic references--often written for middle-school students--have been posted so vaccine critics could learn the basic science.
So far, exactly zero critics have made even a trivial effort at learning the science.
Maddie de Garay is a perfect example.
She has serious medical problems, and she deserves the truth and the best possible medical help.
It has been more than 3 years, and the anti-vaccs have provided ZERO evidence that she was injured by the vaccine.
Instead, all they have claimed is that her doctors are wrong, and the testing is wrong, and the clinical results are wrong...........but no facts and no evidence.
The anti-vaccs have grossly abused her. Do you care?
lol thats not how this works - how do you know hopping on one leg is ineffective for cancer? the people pushing jabs have to show they are safe and effective, not the other way round.
and if you think they have done that in anything like good faith I invite you to google the stories of maddie de garay, brianne dressen and augusto roux - all of whom were trial participants with very severe AEs that pharma / FDA simply dismissed.
maddie de garay, a 12 year old kid, was put in a wheelchair for life by a condition that came on out of nowhere immediately after her jab - but the people running the trial simply asserted it wasn't related to the jab, so there's no problem. remember this is the trial to determine the effects of the jab. it's that easy for them.
https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/mother-of-maddie-de-garay-speaks-out-about-her-13-year-old-daughters-life-altering-injuries-from-pfizers-covid-vaccine
That is exactly how this works.
Over years, basic references--often written for middle-school students--have been posted so vaccine critics could learn the basic science.
So far, exactly zero critics have made even a trivial effort at learning the science.
Maddie de Garay is a perfect example.
She has serious medical problems, and she deserves the truth and the best possible medical help.
It has been more than 3 years, and the anti-vaccs have provided ZERO evidence that she was injured by the vaccine.
Instead, all they have claimed is that her doctors are wrong, and the testing is wrong, and the clinical results are wrong...........but no facts and no evidence.
The anti-vaccs have grossly abused her. Do you care?