BTW, you never got back to me about your ridiculous claim that viruses don’t exist, and how Peter Duesberg supported that claim, did you?
You must have had time by now to appraise his submissions to the Perth Group and for the Continuum award where he lays out the proofs that HIV exists and has been isolated… so why no comeback on your mistake?
BTW, you never got back to me about your ridiculous claim that viruses don’t exist, and how Peter Duesberg supported that claim, did you?
You must have had time by now to appraise his submissions to the Perth Group and for the Continuum award where he lays out the proofs that HIV exists and has been isolated… so why no comeback on your mistake?
Duesbergs book and quote were in 1996. I judge them relative to that period and what was known.
He did support the existence of an HIV virus but NEVER the link to AIDS; the symptoms of which are up to 34 opportunistic infections.
Research Scientists on government grants are unlikely to challenge one anothers claims when its outside their realm of expertise.
HIV much like COVID/SARS has NEVER been isolated. Its the existence of antibody and remnant proteins sorrounding cells viewed from flawed high count PCR tests that drives the drama
Sexually transmitted HIV-AIDS is still a myth. A very profitable one (as your paid handlers will tell you) but still a myth
You dont get to just make up your own narrative no matter how much your handlers are paying you.
Duesbergs claims of the existence of HIV must be seen in the context for which it was made. 1996 thats 3 decades ago. He was a lab researcher beholden to grants. And finally his book "Inventing the AIDS Virus" should tell you everything you need to know.
He was dead on about the link of AIDS to gay males and recreational drugs like uppers. And malnourishment in Africans in war torn countries, even though he was wrong about the existence of HIV.
He rejected the claims of a HIV std link to AIDS. Pointed out how fraudulent FALSE positive PCR tests were used to gin up the narrative in order to sell bilions of dollars worth of anti retrovirals and keep "scientists" on the payroll
And I asked you earlier if Young Emaciated African Children with fleas buzzing around them and extended stomachs from lack of food - were the victims of STD HIV?
>Sorry, you lose.
Where are those silly idiotic infantile emogis that accompany the end of your posts and comments ?
BTW, you never got back to me about your ridiculous claim that viruses don’t exist, and how Peter Duesberg supported that claim, did you?
You must have had time by now to appraise his submissions to the Perth Group and for the Continuum award where he lays out the proofs that HIV exists and has been isolated… so why no comeback on your mistake?
Duesbergs book and quote were in 1996. I judge them relative to that period and what was known.
He did support the existence of an HIV virus but NEVER the link to AIDS; the symptoms of which are up to 34 opportunistic infections.
Research Scientists on government grants are unlikely to challenge one anothers claims when its outside their realm of expertise.
HIV much like COVID/SARS has NEVER been isolated. Its the existence of antibody and remnant proteins sorrounding cells viewed from flawed high count PCR tests that drives the drama
Sexually transmitted HIV-AIDS is still a myth. A very profitable one (as your paid handlers will tell you) but still a myth
So you were WRONG, and Duesberg stated HIV existed and was isolated.
Glad you admit that. Given your adoration of the man, doesn’t that give you any pause for thought about your claim that “Viruses do not exist”?
* This was 1996
* He is a research scientist beholden to grants from health agencies affiliated with pharmaceutical giants
* The main issue of his book remains that there is no sexually transmitted disease link to AIDS
We aren’t discussing whether HIV causes AIDS (that was demonstrated 30-40 years ago)
We are discussing whether Duesberg stated HIV exists.
He did, and said it had been isolated. This proves your claim that he said “HIV does not exist” to be false.
>We aren’t discussing whether HIV causes AIDS
Yes we are.
> (that was demonstrated 30-40 years ago)
No it wasnt
No, we are discussing your claim viruses don’t exist, and your false claim that Duesberg says they don’t exist.
He says they exist….Sorry, you lose.
You dont get to just make up your own narrative no matter how much your handlers are paying you.
Duesbergs claims of the existence of HIV must be seen in the context for which it was made. 1996 thats 3 decades ago. He was a lab researcher beholden to grants. And finally his book "Inventing the AIDS Virus" should tell you everything you need to know.
He was dead on about the link of AIDS to gay males and recreational drugs like uppers. And malnourishment in Africans in war torn countries, even though he was wrong about the existence of HIV.
He rejected the claims of a HIV std link to AIDS. Pointed out how fraudulent FALSE positive PCR tests were used to gin up the narrative in order to sell bilions of dollars worth of anti retrovirals and keep "scientists" on the payroll
And I asked you earlier if Young Emaciated African Children with fleas buzzing around them and extended stomachs from lack of food - were the victims of STD HIV?
>Sorry, you lose.
Where are those silly idiotic infantile emogis that accompany the end of your posts and comments ?
You mean these…🙄?