It’s not hard for lawyers to trip up scientists in court. Here’s how they do it.
Then maybe we should remove the protection the vaccine industry has for not being sued for adverse effects if they claim their shots do not cause autism. But if you have children that have been severely damaged with autism due to the shots all your arguments will never hold water.
How about this question: ARE THERE ANY UNVACCINATED KIDS WITH AUTISM?
*** There are NO such studies. Have I answered all your questions?
If Paul Offit had any integrity in this he would have been more analytical in his VRBPAC assessment of Pfizer’s own claims compared with the actual Pfizer data. Both VAERS and other countries reporting systems significantly under report serious adverse events, yet, in Pfizer’s own words and in the Periodic Safety Update reports out of the EU, the numbers and range of these SAEs are hugely significant raising the need for further scientific inquiry. In the first 6months of the rollout, PSUR #1 reported 1.3 million serious adverse events in it’s population. While small compared with the target population, surely concern should have been aroused. Time to sit back, reevaluate the data and have a reasoned scientific debate about the findings that the FDA/CDC had during the EUA and subsequently. Truth is out there but may have more than one side to it. I am afraid these ‘experts’ have lost my Trust for good.
Reading the comments at a glance, it would appear that most people aren’t falling for your vaccine propaganda any longer, Dr. Offit.
It’s pointless to argue with Paul Offitt who has one goal ...make money for pharma. He cares nothing about your health.
Such crap! Why anyone who has taken a serious scan of the rampant corruption of government and their 3-letter agencies would take belief in any "studies" from those currupt entities is just beyond truth and reality, and IMO, blasphemous.
I take issue with the statement that myocarditis and blood clots were not anticipated to be problems associated with the Covid vaccines. They were both identified as potential side effects of concern in FDA briefing documents.
That adenovirus vectors can cause thrombocytic thrombocytopenia has been known in the literature since 2007.
They should have been monitored closely and any issues detected far more swiftly than the CDC later (begrudgingly) acknowledged, long after other countries had done so. To claim myocarditis rates of only 1 in 50k is to obscure & diminish the much higher rate in young men.
This article is disingenuous at best. And I’m being very generous there.
You are so funny! Mr Siri is getting quite close to the truth - vaccines are dangerous. And you’re trying to cover up this fact with semantics. I guess Mr Siri is capable of better logic.
First sentence - scientific truths - is absurd. It shows the intentional bias of Offit. Anyone still promoting the mRNA vax after all that has emerged is on someone’s payroll. If I were a doctor and had promoted these poisons I would be too ashamed to continue practicing.
If the trials aren’t designed to detect serious side effects why would anyone with more than two functioning brain cells allow themselves to be used as the Guinea Pig? Especially when the manufacturer has ZERO LIABILITY?
1 in 100 affected by autism? I believe this is misinformation. We know prevalence rates continue to climb but you don’t appear interested in helping families, just mocking and belittling them.
Ho much money have you made supporting vaccines?
You can not find if you refuse to look which is what we are doing now. Offit knows this and continues to promote the lies that the Covid-19 MRNA shots are safe and effective even though it’s been shown that they are neither effective nor are they safe. Hundreds of thousands are dead because they were killed by the shots and not because they caught Covid-19. He will pay the ultimate price when his time in this world comes to an end.
"consistently promotes false and dangerously misleading information about vaccines."
citation PLEASE . . . .
Offit cites the C19 vaccine trials showing "low risk" of certain adverse effects, but those numbers aren't reflected in real world observations. Real world is showing much higher incidents of AE.
Which leads to the obvious questions: Why did pharma get the numbers for AE so wrong? What other drugs are the trial numbers so badly off compared to real world? Why hasn't the FDA pulled the Covid vaccines from the market due to the dangerously high number of AE?
The trends in Autism diagnosis correlate directly with trends in the increase in numbers of childhood vaccine schedule. Has this correlation been disproven from being actual cause? No.