Connecticut Stands Up for Its Children
Connecticut recently bucked the national trend by eliminating a religious exemption to vaccination.
On February 13, 2024, National Geographic published a book I wrote called, TELL ME WHEN IT’S OVER: AN INSIDER’S GUIDE TO DECIPHERING COVID MYTHS AND NAVIGATING OUR POST-PANDEMIC WORLD. For the past few months, I have been writing about various issues discussed in that book.
Between January 2020 and March 2024, the CDC reported 338 cases of measles in 30 US states and jurisdictions. These outbreaks were consistent with a CDC survey showing that more parents are choosing non-medical vaccine exemptions, such as religious or philosophical exemptions, for their school children. Connecticut, however, is standing up to those who, in the name of religious freedoms, are putting children at unnecessary risk.
In 2000, the United States eliminated measles, the most contagious of the vaccine-preventable diseases. Success centered on the enforcement of school vaccine mandates that have existed in all 50 states since 1981. Unfortunately, during the past few years, legislative efforts by anti-vaccine groups have made it easier to opt out of vaccines for non-medical reasons. As a consequence, immunization rates among school children have dropped and measles has come back.
In Connecticut, on the other hand, immunization rates have risen for two straight years, exceeding pre-pandemic levels. During the 2022-2023 school year, more than 97 percent of Connecticut kindergartners were vaccinated against measles, up from 95.7 percent the year before and 95.3 percent the year before that. Why? The answer can be found in a 2021 law that eliminated the state’s religious exemption to vaccination. Immunization rates of 95 percent or higher are required to provide herd immunity against measles. When rates drop, which is true in many states that now offer either religious or philosophical exemptions, measles comes back. The most dramatic example being an outbreak in Philadelphia in 1991 that centered on two fundamentalist churches that refused vaccines. During a three-month period, measles virus infected 1,400 people in the city and killed nine. All the deaths were in young children.
On its face, the phrase “religious exemptions to vaccination” is a contradiction in terms. All religions teach us to care about our children and our families and our neighbors. Choosing to put our children and those with whom they come in contact at risk is the opposite of a religious act. Further, about 9 million people in the United States, because they are on immune suppressive therapies for their cancers or transplants or autoimmune diseases, can’t be vaccinated. They depend on those around them for protection. Do we have a responsibility to love our neighbor?
Amy Pisani, a Connecticut resident, and head of the national group Vaccinate Your Family, praised the hard work required to counter the efforts of anti-vaccine groups to overturn vaccine mandates. "From the top down, we have incredibly supportive legislators,” said Pisani. “And when you have government agencies that are supportive at that level, it allows our public health officials to do their job." As measles cases rise this year, and will no doubt return next winter, parents in Connecticut can feel more comfortable that state health officials and legislators have their backs.
Standing in stark contrast to efforts to protect children in Connecticut are those in Mississippi. In July 2023, Mississippi, which had up to that point only offered medical exemptions, became the most recent state to offer a religious exemption to vaccination. More than 2,000 parents immediately chose to exempt their children. The effort was not spearheaded by a religious group, but rather a virulent anti-vaccine group called Informed Consent Action Network. The lawyer who headed that effort paradoxically declared, “Freedom wins again.” Freedom to catch and transmit potentially deadly infections. Hardly a victory for children.
Do I think parents should vaccinate their children against many diseases? Sure, particularly when the benefit exceeds the risk. But stop forcing people into participating in medical procedures they don't want. Government along with regulatory agencies, doctors and the pharmaceutical industry have proven time and time again they cannot be trusted. The authoritative approach only makes things worse.
I often wondered what the religious basis was for religious exemptions, since I'm pretty sure none of the sacred texts of any religion mentions vaccines. A brief Google search indicates that the basis is that vaccines interfere with "divine providence." (link below) That would be true of every medical treatment, so clearly there is a logical contradiction going on which legislation and courts should recognize but apparently don't. But in my experience, pointing out logical errors, as well as labeling people "selfish," are not effective strategies for changing minds. I have a dear and loving friend who is an Evangelical and embodies care for others. But she is terrified of vaccines because she has been convinced that they caused her son's autism, and she did not vaccinate the 3 kids born after the son with autism. When a mutual friend told her that she needs to think of other children's lives and not just her own (the mutual friend had a baby grandchild who had to fly to a hospital for treatment for a rare disease and was too young to be vaccinated), my religious friend said with what appeared to be genuineness, "I hadn't thought of that." She seemed truly troubled. I think these conversations need to be had with compassion and kindness IRL with those they trust for any change to occur.
https://www.vumc.org/health-wellness/resource-articles/immunizations-and-religion#:~:text=Some members decline vaccination on,Faith Tabernacle