The CDC recently recommended an RSV vaccine for pregnant women
So, the lab rats are actual mothers and their pre-born babies. Got it. Is surveillance in place to see if the RSV vaccine actually works? You know like, does it work as well as the Covid shots that were so “promising?”
My children were born in the 1980s, before the explosion of the “recommended” vaccine schedule. Kids back then were SO much healthier than today’s kids. I see it in my grandkids and it breaks my heart. Allergies, eczema, frequent illness not to mention explosions of ASD and ADHD today. The natural God-given immune system is being destroyed by constant introduction of man-made products. Parents need to wake up and follow the money because that’s where they will find “The Science”.
Unreal. CDC is captured.
Disgusting and evil to give this to pregnant women. A warning to all to what happens when eugenics and science mix.
We are slowly depleting and altering our innate immune systems. Post and MODERN Vaccine solutions have gone way too far, no longer serving the "Greater Good" please Dr. think farward by looking back.
How sad that scientists are involved in tbis racket.
Maternal antibodies passively cross the placenta and provide a critical source of immunity to newborns before their immune systems are mature enough to respond to pathogens. Additional maternal antibodies are transmitted after birth in mother's milk from breast-feeding. Because RSV infection causes severe infections to the youngest of infants and babies, passive transfer of antibodies specific to RSV is beneficial. This is why vaccines were developed to stimulate maternal production of anti-RSV antibodies at the end of gestation. If there are side effects (including increased premature births) these will be noted in large population studies post-FDA licensure. Then a pregnant woman and her obstetrician can weigh the costs and benefits of those risks.
We’re all just lab rats for these snake oil salesmen. Human life has no value unless drugs can be sold.
Dr. Offit. You are reckless in your determinations. As the parent of 2 vaccine injured children, one of whom I walked out of non-verbal autism with functional medicine protocols, I am appalled at your ignorance and expect far better from someone academically trained to look at ALL the data. Why do you think it’s ok to sacrifice the next generation when we CLEARLY have an issue with our youth and autism. What do you supposed happens to our country when everyone has some sort of autoimmune disease. Once upon a time, antibiotics we the “miracle” until is was overused. Why on earth would vaccination be any different. I do pray for your soul sir, bc I think the harm you’ve reaped on the most vulnerable in our society is egoism at it’s worst.
How dare you make the world your lab rats without any consideration for the harm you are supporting. Shame on you and every doctor who can’t read all the data .
I think if I were trying to counsel someone about this I would favor the nirsevimab option, or the vaccine at 35-36 weeks. I would definitely do one or the other.
Probably not enough maternal morbidity with RSV to worry about studying the beneficial effects of vaccination for the mother? Yet this quote i found was shocking and would seem inflated, but another reason to favor vaccination:
“Indeed, a prospective study reported that 50% of RSV-positive pregnant women developed a severe infection requiring more than 3 days of hospitalization, and 40% of them was diagnosed as having pneumonia. Interestingly, preterm birth occurred more frequently in RSV-positive pregnant women when compared to RSV-negative controls. Also, complications were more frequent with third trimester infections (59). In a more recent study, authors showed that 10 out of 20 pregnant women with RSV infection were hospitalized for pneumonia, atelectasis, respiratory failure, or sepsis (60), and 9 of them had at least one comorbid condition such as asthma, obesity, or co-infection. Again, 9 out of 10 pregnant women were hospitalized during the third trimester of pregnancy, a period in which major physiologic changes occur in the maternal respiratory and immune systems. It should be noted that the true incidence of RSV infection in pregnancy might be underdiagnosed due to infrequent testing.”
That hospitalization rate seems really high me, so I’m sure that a lot of mild cases of RSV were not being included in the denominator. Yet like most infections in pregnancy, mothers are at higher risk.
Also there is evidence of vertical (mother to baby) transmission of RSV during pregnancy, which increases the development of of asthma and airway hyperreactivity in utero:
So maybe favor the vaccine if third trimester during RSV season, both for mother and baby?
Thanks for the summary. I'd wondered about the change from 24 to 32 weeks but had not had time to delve into this.
People like Albus Dumbledore just make me turn to God even more and as a mother, just like Our Holy Mother Mary, I know without a doubt that these vaccine potions are not made with loving, healing hands. They’re made from evil, greedy, power hungry eugenics who think that the world is way too crowded and want to eliminate the nuclear family and cause confusion in scared mothers. Thank you, God if my words reach just one scared mother, I can feel Gods light and truth shining down on all who want to look and listen! Amen!
Guys come on.
All figures are available just go look at Dr John Cambells YT or on SS - as well as all the GVT sites worldwide, although they are very slow to come out hmmm. Llatest excess deaths a disaster not spoken about in MSM and you’ll see straight away that @BethNotKaren has a good point. Interested to hear though what @KB thinks of the nano tech dots we ALL have in our blood now from such shots..... even if we didn’t have them, tested and found in rain water, food, ther meds including insulin and anaesthetics. Horror! Interested to hear what how you feel about being “frequency” zapped and therefore mind/ body controlled by the powers that be... our trusted governments?
Glad to hear it. You’ll be supporting efforts to negate the effects of the pandemic through vaccination and treatment then.
It’s interesting, when I read the study I thought of it as premature birth a month after the injection does not make physiologic sense. We consider other adverse reactions more than a month later unlikely to be related, this one wasn’t statistically significant and seems unlikely. That said the answer is to either get it closer to delivery or use beyfortus. I am just so excited as a pediatrician to offer parents options.
What a pile of horse💩, if the mother breast feeds she will pass on natural immunity no need for anything else. How on earth did mothers do yrs ago when there wasn’t any immunisations and both children and adults were not as healthy as they are today. I know as I’m from a family of nine. With none of this nonsense.