So, the lab rats are actual mothers and their pre-born babies. Got it. Is surveillance in place to see if the RSV vaccine actually works? You know like, does it work as well as the Covid shots that were so “promising?”
This is easy: do the opposite of what the CDC says. That was already my plan after witnessing the death shot debacle. But, when they advised about bio men chest feeding, well, you can stick a fork in ‘em!
According to the life insurance industry, their actuarial analysis demonstrates that being unvaccinated against covid dramatically increases your risk of death or disability.
Please explain their calculation errors. Be specific and show your work.
I note that you didn't even attempt to explain the life insurance companies data.
Surprise! You provided a link from some kook whose argument fails middle-school science....somehow you missed that.....this really does keep coming up.....
Here is a simple starting point, offered because it is so easy to understand:
"The data is consistent across every player {life insurance company} in the business.”
"He said the data shows COVID deaths are greatly understated among working age Americans. "
"Because of this, insurance companies are beginning to add premium increases on employers in counties with ****low vaccination rates**** to cover the benefit payouts."
So we can choose from your completely innumerate and incompetent substack or the world-wide experience of life insurance companies.
I just attempted to read that piece. His use of statistics is rather "unique" which in my world means he's manipulating the data to prove what he wants rather than analyzing the data to evaluate what it really shows. In other words, as noted by Albus, his results are not reliable. Or, rephrased, you found a random article that solely supports your narrative.
It's concerning because one possesses the capacity to think and to recall events from memory. In the absence of these capacities, one should experience no concern at all.
And the recommendations will change several more times. You know how it goes: if you get the vax, you won’t get or spread the virus; er, if you get the virus, you won’t be sick enough to go to the hospital; er... der... you won’t die? ... speaking of waking up, I hope I wake up from this nightmare. You do you.
All figures are available just go look at Dr John Cambells YT or on SS - latest excess deaths and you’ll see straight away that @BethNotKaren has a good point. Interested to hear though what @KB thinks of the nano tech dots we all have in our blood now from such shots..... and that’s being found in rain water and food and how you feel about being “frequency” zapped and therefore mind/ body controlled by the powers that be... our trusted governments?
Post authorization studies are done with all vaccines and drugs. Things can change, yes. The question you should ask yourself is, did I die from contacting the virus?
And you believe Pfizer? Why? When Bernie Madoff eventually gets out of prison would you invest with him? Why would you believe anything that comes from Albert Bourla and Co? “Oh great! The RSV vaccine is safe and effective. I will definitely get that vax for me and my unborn child. I mean, seriously. What could go wrong?”
Strange as it may seem, Dr Offit’s articles are commented on by health care professionals, and not just medically ignorant conspiracy theorists like yourself.
That’s how all vaccines are ultimately tested. Animal models can only go so far. Note that the recommendations changed when a safety signal was identified.
No they didn’t. They hid the safety signal for months and months. FDA knew about myocarditis from early 2021 after being informed by military doctors. They ignored it.
Military doctors were not the first to note myocarditis. The FDA did not conspire to “hide the safety signal”, they issued advisories. The problem is so rare and so inconsequential that it hardly bears the major fuss you make about it. But I guess when the vaccine turned out to be so safe that myocarditis was the worst thing anyone could say about it, you have to propagandise what you’ve got.
This is about RSV vaccine, anyway. Please don’t raise irrelevant topics.
Well the 1:35 is from a study looking not at myocarditis in clinical terms but at any elevations of cardiac troponin, something that may affect many people following an immune stimulus like vaccination. The study only identified one person with clinical myocarditis (symptomatic). All the studies looking at myocarditis following Covid vaccine indicate it is almost always mild, transient, and only very rarely does it cause serious disease.
Myocarditis from Covid is around 6-7 times more likely than is myocarditis post vaccination.
Recent studies show post vaccination myocarditis is so infrequent it has faded into the background usual incidence rate.
Is “mild pneumonitis” from Covid an oxymoron too? “Oh, it’s just your lungs”.
A Thai private boys school had the same 1 in 35 heart issue also. As far as COVID itself being 6-7 times as likely to cause myocarditis, that is nonsense to the point I have to assume you are paid by Pfizer. LeBron’s son and ANOTHER teammate both had heart attacks. Same team, both within six months of each other. Two teammates on the Edmonton Oilers had to be taken off the rosters for heart issues post vax. All the increased myocarditis has occurred post vax. NOT in 2020.
All I can say to you is there are other ways to make a living than shilling for a death dealer.
Depending on the sensitivity of the test, troponin can be positive for any number of non-cardiac events, including infection. Focusing solely on troponin was, in fact, a weakness of the original study looking at hospitalization for myocarditits.
Albus, this isn't directed AT you, but in support thereof.
I'm hampered here by having seen and helped treat myocarditis in the past. It comes in varying "intensities". While I've not treated a case of either vaccine- or COVID-induced myocarditis, I've colleagues who have done so in the last several years. Vaccine-induced myocarditis resulted, generally, in a 2-3 day hospital stay and no untoward sequalae after 6 weeks. COVID-induced myocarditis has seen numerous deaths and long-term damage to the heart muscle. Cardiologists talking to colleagues and friends don't make this stuff up; there's no benefit in it. NOR do the honest ones make up something readily disproved for publication, because medical science revolves around repeating someone else's studies to be able to verify the results rather than just believing a single study's (or worse, a single center's) results.
Having spent my entire career in science, and a big portion of that in medical research, with publications, AND serving as a reviewer for several journals, I know how this works. It's pretty obvious there are people here who don't possess a clue, nor could they identify one on a good day.
During the course of the pandemic, I rather dispassionately read a few thousand articles critically, virtually always reading them as a reviewer, and submitting questions for elucidation to the authors. Because of the manner and nature of my queries I almost always got replies; the few who didn't reply often had the weaker articles. I analyzed the numbers using a standard epidemiological process without any attempt to edit anything. I reported the numbers as they came out. At least as long as we had sufficient testing infrastructure to have any faith that our sample size was sufficient for valid population data. What I reported was as unbiased as I could possibly make it, mostly due to the fact that I simply fed the same sources' data into my programs and reported the data. In other words my work, like that of virtually all the scientists I've associated with through my career, were the best I could provide without agenda or intent to influence anyone without some basis in science. For the record, I have disagreed with the CDC, mostly during the previous administration, when Redfield was in charge. Walensky inherited a disaster, and made strides in revamping and restoring the system. Cohen has a slightly less damaged landscape to start with but is still having to shape the future with fewer solid tools and senior scientists than when Redfield arrived with a directive to slash the agency, for which we saw a mass exodus of irreplaceable senior science talent. Those who want to slam CDC need to consider this: As with any large institution, it has its problems, but unlike most government agencies, it's mostly apolitical... until an administration starts censoring posts from career scientists and clinicians because they don't conform to the "correct" narrative. CDC is an exemplar for other nations to follow, and has left a positive mark across the world. Disparaging it because someone has a poor opinion but no real interactions professionally is fairly juvenile, but is consistent with a lot of the comments I've seen on Paul Offitt's blog here. And it's in very poor form.
Use of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine After Reports of Myocarditis Among Vaccine Recipients: Update from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices — United States, June 2021
Final comment on this. Military doctors in both Finland and the USA did notice a marked rise in mild myocarditis following vaccination, not against CoViD19 but against Smallpox.
A number of the early Israeli reports raised serious questions of methodology. It took nearly 6 months for us to sort out some of their processes before we could honestly evaluate their findings. Let's say their work was 'hasty'.
If you are talking about the first RSV candidate vaccine trial in the 1960s, we learned a lot in 60 years. Besides,never made it to market as it failed in trial.
Pre-fusion F is absent on the surface of formalin-inactivated respiratory syncytial virus
My children were born in the 1980s, before the explosion of the “recommended” vaccine schedule. Kids back then were SO much healthier than today’s kids. I see it in my grandkids and it breaks my heart. Allergies, eczema, frequent illness not to mention explosions of ASD and ADHD today. The natural God-given immune system is being destroyed by constant introduction of man-made products. Parents need to wake up and follow the money because that’s where they will find “The Science”.
The same immune system that in the 1800 that prevented death in 537.11 out of 10000 child by age 5? Meaning that 462.89 children died by age 5 in the 1800?
Why? He’s not even a medical doctor. He’s just a kook who’s fallen for audience capture, so he churns out antivax propaganda that he’s able to make a lot of money from.
He’s spent most of his life teaching nurses and knows very well how the NHS works. He’s not the only one there plenty of data crunchers doing the work. You feel to me like you just want to crush everything around you rather than being open and willing. If you know so much share your valuable
Not true. 1: if you search (not censored google) for data from Malone, kirsch, McCullough and more, you can find loads of data that show the jab has affected the T cell line of your immune system. It’s why rare and aggressive cancers have exploded (you can look that up too)
Also, Look at Dr Paul Thomas’s data and stats. You can YouTube it. It’s quite the opposite.
Do your own research that’s NOT MSM. CNN, msnbc, etc
Also, when you work in a hospital and hear Code Strokes called all day. Not to mention the #diedsuddenly ‘s. But what is so tragic is the rise in spontaneous abortions. With no access to vax records, I can’t make actual connections. People with eyes and half a brain can make connections though.
So why would you choose to get the same poison by shot that is the virus thus increasing the amount of poison that might not ever disappear as was promised? It was not supposed to go to every organ in your body. Why do you keep believing when they have lied about everything?
The amount of MRNA and spike protein getting into the systemic circulation after vaccination is tiny. IIRC, around 0.009% ended up in the ovaries, for example.
Would you read it? I don't think you will. You have a mindset that vaccines work and are life saving and you will not be deterred from that. If you are really open to this then I suggest you read Turtles All The Way Down Vaccine Science and Myth which was written anonymously by two Israeli scientists.
We are slowly depleting and altering our innate immune systems. Post and MODERN Vaccine solutions have gone way too far, no longer serving the "Greater Good" please Dr. think farward by looking back.
You seriously need to do further research. I don’t know how your missing the data on the millions affected for life by the shots and the hundreds of thousands if not millions of deaths directly related to the shots. Just saying.
I have also proven here how the assertion that the shots have killed thousands/millions is a flat out lie and that simply use of 5th grade math proves it is a lie.
All I have gotten so far from the anti-vaccs is lots of name-calling, but zero willingness to even try and get the facts right.
Maybe you will be the first?
I expect to be off line for the next ~ 2weeks, but the evidence is already posted here at Dr. Offit's substack...if you are willing to look.
Most people who get the Covid™ jab won't die, just like most people who eat sugar won't die.
But your health risks are increased in both scenarios.
My childhood dentist used to say: Eat sugar and support your local dentist! Remember big pHarma does not want to cure you... nor do your docs who are bought and paid for.
Thank-you for your question and comment. Maybe I will be the first!
Many "Anti-Vac" are more "Intuitives" then they are researchers, so in that sense I agree with your statement. Most have gone through the "Rabbit Hole" one way or another and at some point simply begin to trust their alternative media news sources. I am not an "Anti" anything. I am however stubborn enough to be a skeptic. So, I force myself to always listen to both sides of the various debates going on. That is one the reasons I am here reading Dr. Offit's substack. I follow many others...John Campbell, Dr. Mobean, Ed Dowd, Dr.Prasad,Darkhorse, Dr.Dhan just to name a few. BTW most of these experts have gone down the rabbit hole at the same time.
Are you willing to go down that rabbit hole (respectfully) as I did? If so, it would be my pleasure to engage.
Maternal antibodies passively cross the placenta and provide a critical source of immunity to newborns before their immune systems are mature enough to respond to pathogens. Additional maternal antibodies are transmitted after birth in mother's milk from breast-feeding. Because RSV infection causes severe infections to the youngest of infants and babies, passive transfer of antibodies specific to RSV is beneficial. This is why vaccines were developed to stimulate maternal production of anti-RSV antibodies at the end of gestation. If there are side effects (including increased premature births) these will be noted in large population studies post-FDA licensure. Then a pregnant woman and her obstetrician can weigh the costs and benefits of those risks.
While post vaccine studies are needed, those pregnant women that choose to be vaccinated may have certain traits that are different from women that don’t choose to be vaccinated. More RCT’s are needed. Preferably by an independent scientist.
Dr. Offit. You are reckless in your determinations. As the parent of 2 vaccine injured children, one of whom I walked out of non-verbal autism with functional medicine protocols, I am appalled at your ignorance and expect far better from someone academically trained to look at ALL the data. Why do you think it’s ok to sacrifice the next generation when we CLEARLY have an issue with our youth and autism. What do you supposed happens to our country when everyone has some sort of autoimmune disease. Once upon a time, antibiotics we the “miracle” until is was overused. Why on earth would vaccination be any different. I do pray for your soul sir, bc I think the harm you’ve reaped on the most vulnerable in our society is egoism at it’s worst.
How dare you make the world your lab rats without any consideration for the harm you are supporting. Shame on you and every doctor who can’t read all the data .
I think if I were trying to counsel someone about this I would favor the nirsevimab option, or the vaccine at 35-36 weeks. I would definitely do one or the other.
Probably not enough maternal morbidity with RSV to worry about studying the beneficial effects of vaccination for the mother? Yet this quote i found was shocking and would seem inflated, but another reason to favor vaccination:
“Indeed, a prospective study reported that 50% of RSV-positive pregnant women developed a severe infection requiring more than 3 days of hospitalization, and 40% of them was diagnosed as having pneumonia. Interestingly, preterm birth occurred more frequently in RSV-positive pregnant women when compared to RSV-negative controls. Also, complications were more frequent with third trimester infections (59). In a more recent study, authors showed that 10 out of 20 pregnant women with RSV infection were hospitalized for pneumonia, atelectasis, respiratory failure, or sepsis (60), and 9 of them had at least one comorbid condition such as asthma, obesity, or co-infection. Again, 9 out of 10 pregnant women were hospitalized during the third trimester of pregnancy, a period in which major physiologic changes occur in the maternal respiratory and immune systems. It should be noted that the true incidence of RSV infection in pregnancy might be underdiagnosed due to infrequent testing.”
That hospitalization rate seems really high me, so I’m sure that a lot of mild cases of RSV were not being included in the denominator. Yet like most infections in pregnancy, mothers are at higher risk.
Also there is evidence of vertical (mother to baby) transmission of RSV during pregnancy, which increases the development of of asthma and airway hyperreactivity in utero:
All figures are available just go look at Dr John Cambells YT or on SS - as well as all the GVT sites worldwide, although they are very slow to come out hmmm. Llatest excess deaths a disaster not spoken about in MSM and you’ll see straight away that @BethNotKaren has a good point. Interested to hear though what @KB thinks of the nano tech dots we ALL have in our blood now from such shots..... even if we didn’t have them, tested and found in rain water, food, ther meds including insulin and anaesthetics. Horror! Interested to hear what how you feel about being “frequency” zapped and therefore mind/ body controlled by the powers that be... our trusted governments?
I’d rather hear what one of the world’s most admired infectious disease and vaccine experts says about this than listen to a non-scientist on his YouTube videos.
But please, tell us more about the phenomenon of being “frequency zapped” for mind control and the “nanotech dots” we have had injected with the vaccines. I’m all ears.
I’m also confused about what you term the “excess death disaster”.
Last time I looked, excess deaths were still declining globally.
There’s also fantastic data analysis on Substack with updated figures and mathematical interrogation which is easy to find. There’s obviously way more available on all resources across internet. Algorithms are probably sending you to the misinformation sadly. Step outside the matrix a bit.... just for fun and the treasures you will find. I sincerely hope you can. The more of us genuinely trying to find the answers get there in the end. It’s not meant to be easy.
Please visit some excellent researchers here on Substack, to start off at least...
Dr Ana Mihalcea there’s plenty more scientists following with repeatedly stacked evidence re nanotechnology miraculously finding its way into all bloods (humans) now. Tread gently and be kind to yourself, it’s not for the faint hearted and demands courage on all levels to continue researching.
Dr Zac Bush (Biologist) highlights the chemical changes occurring in the mind/ body in response to the “inks” the plethora of artificial chemicals, metals and DNA and then you could move onto
Dr Bryan Ardis on his in-depth research of what the virus actually is/was. It circulates in the air and water so it’s everywhere now. There’s so much research on this by eminent scientists etc.
There are soooo many resources to delve into from scientists holding Noble Laureates, peer reviewed scientists, virologists, biologists, surgeons, doctors, real humans affected by this chemical bioweapon.... which is actually stated on Pfizer’s MRNA patent, bla bla bla bla theres endless eveidence.
open BOTH eyes and just then maybe you will jump start that 3rd eye of yours which will unlock the door to truth. It’s all there for us if we choose to “see” it. It’s all there in plain sight.
It’s interesting, when I read the study I thought of it as premature birth a month after the injection does not make physiologic sense. We consider other adverse reactions more than a month later unlikely to be related, this one wasn’t statistically significant and seems unlikely. That said the answer is to either get it closer to delivery or use beyfortus. I am just so excited as a pediatrician to offer parents options.
What a pile of horse💩, if the mother breast feeds she will pass on natural immunity no need for anything else. How on earth did mothers do yrs ago when there wasn’t any immunisations and both children and adults were not as healthy as they are today. I know as I’m from a family of nine. With none of this nonsense.
So, the lab rats are actual mothers and their pre-born babies. Got it. Is surveillance in place to see if the RSV vaccine actually works? You know like, does it work as well as the Covid shots that were so “promising?”
When doctors use a big red flag like "CDC Recommended" to con(vince) patients, then we have a lot to be concerned about.
Why is it concerning?
This is easy: do the opposite of what the CDC says. That was already my plan after witnessing the death shot debacle. But, when they advised about bio men chest feeding, well, you can stick a fork in ‘em!
Glad this is easy.
According to the life insurance industry, their actuarial analysis demonstrates that being unvaccinated against covid dramatically increases your risk of death or disability.
Please explain their calculation errors. Be specific and show your work.
Thanks.
Here is a link with data that refutes your unsubstantiated claim about actuarial analysis (you didn’t show your work).
https://usmortality.substack.com/p/who-admits-excess-deaths
Thanks!
That link is to WHO calculations of excess mortality and has nothing to do with vaccination.
Try again.
I note that you didn't even attempt to explain the life insurance companies data.
Surprise! You provided a link from some kook whose argument fails middle-school science....somehow you missed that.....this really does keep coming up.....
Here is a simple starting point, offered because it is so easy to understand:
https://www.wfyi.org/news/articles/insurance-death-rates-working-age-people-up-40-percent
"The data is consistent across every player {life insurance company} in the business.”
"He said the data shows COVID deaths are greatly understated among working age Americans. "
"Because of this, insurance companies are beginning to add premium increases on employers in counties with ****low vaccination rates**** to cover the benefit payouts."
So we can choose from your completely innumerate and incompetent substack or the world-wide experience of life insurance companies.
Easy call!
I just attempted to read that piece. His use of statistics is rather "unique" which in my world means he's manipulating the data to prove what he wants rather than analyzing the data to evaluate what it really shows. In other words, as noted by Albus, his results are not reliable. Or, rephrased, you found a random article that solely supports your narrative.
Albus must be a retired school teacher.
It's concerning because one possesses the capacity to think and to recall events from memory. In the absence of these capacities, one should experience no concern at all.
I find it very concerning that you continue to provide zero facts or data, but instead instantly resort to censorship.
Rational thinkers are left asking: are you acting with malice?
Rational thinkers are thinking Albus is stupid.
Oh look....mindless personal attacks, but zero facts or data.
Thanks for demonstrating that it takes willful stupidity to believe the anti-vaccs.
More name calling fro you, the person that claimed the unvaccinated hockey player was vaccinated.
Got anything honest to offer?
If you do studies on the use of vaccines in pregnancy, yes pregnant women are your “lab rats”.
The studies on whether the vaccine works have been done; it does work, hence the recommendation.
Wake up.
And the recommendations will change several more times. You know how it goes: if you get the vax, you won’t get or spread the virus; er, if you get the virus, you won’t be sick enough to go to the hospital; er... der... you won’t die? ... speaking of waking up, I hope I wake up from this nightmare. You do you.
Guys come on.
All figures are available just go look at Dr John Cambells YT or on SS - latest excess deaths and you’ll see straight away that @BethNotKaren has a good point. Interested to hear though what @KB thinks of the nano tech dots we all have in our blood now from such shots..... and that’s being found in rain water and food and how you feel about being “frequency” zapped and therefore mind/ body controlled by the powers that be... our trusted governments?
YouTube videos aren’t evidence.
Albus? That you?
You really need to work on basic reading skills!
Post authorization studies are done with all vaccines and drugs. Things can change, yes. The question you should ask yourself is, did I die from contacting the virus?
...Or did I die from the vaccine? Fixed it for you
The basic logic of cause and effect still apply....
Exactly
And you believe Pfizer? Why? When Bernie Madoff eventually gets out of prison would you invest with him? Why would you believe anything that comes from Albert Bourla and Co? “Oh great! The RSV vaccine is safe and effective. I will definitely get that vax for me and my unborn child. I mean, seriously. What could go wrong?”
"And you believe Pfizer?"
As pointed out many times, you don't have to believe/trust Pfizer.
Yes, you do. Thats like saying ‘I can trust Bernie Madoff. These guys are heavily regulated.’
I have already proven that is not true.
You just ignore the facts.
Strange as it may seem, Dr Offit’s articles are commented on by health care professionals, and not just medically ignorant conspiracy theorists like yourself.
That’s how all vaccines are ultimately tested. Animal models can only go so far. Note that the recommendations changed when a safety signal was identified.
No they didn’t. They hid the safety signal for months and months. FDA knew about myocarditis from early 2021 after being informed by military doctors. They ignored it.
Military doctors were not the first to note myocarditis. The FDA did not conspire to “hide the safety signal”, they issued advisories. The problem is so rare and so inconsequential that it hardly bears the major fuss you make about it. But I guess when the vaccine turned out to be so safe that myocarditis was the worst thing anyone could say about it, you have to propagandise what you’ve got.
This is about RSV vaccine, anyway. Please don’t raise irrelevant topics.
1 in 35 is quite rare, now isn't it? And 'mild myocarditis' is an oxymoron. Oh, it's just your heart.
Well the 1:35 is from a study looking not at myocarditis in clinical terms but at any elevations of cardiac troponin, something that may affect many people following an immune stimulus like vaccination. The study only identified one person with clinical myocarditis (symptomatic). All the studies looking at myocarditis following Covid vaccine indicate it is almost always mild, transient, and only very rarely does it cause serious disease.
Myocarditis from Covid is around 6-7 times more likely than is myocarditis post vaccination.
Recent studies show post vaccination myocarditis is so infrequent it has faded into the background usual incidence rate.
Is “mild pneumonitis” from Covid an oxymoron too? “Oh, it’s just your lungs”.
A Thai private boys school had the same 1 in 35 heart issue also. As far as COVID itself being 6-7 times as likely to cause myocarditis, that is nonsense to the point I have to assume you are paid by Pfizer. LeBron’s son and ANOTHER teammate both had heart attacks. Same team, both within six months of each other. Two teammates on the Edmonton Oilers had to be taken off the rosters for heart issues post vax. All the increased myocarditis has occurred post vax. NOT in 2020.
All I can say to you is there are other ways to make a living than shilling for a death dealer.
Depending on the sensitivity of the test, troponin can be positive for any number of non-cardiac events, including infection. Focusing solely on troponin was, in fact, a weakness of the original study looking at hospitalization for myocarditits.
"And 'mild myocarditis' is an oxymoron."
No it is not.
You just have to google mild or subclinical to find that your claim isn't true.
Albus, this isn't directed AT you, but in support thereof.
I'm hampered here by having seen and helped treat myocarditis in the past. It comes in varying "intensities". While I've not treated a case of either vaccine- or COVID-induced myocarditis, I've colleagues who have done so in the last several years. Vaccine-induced myocarditis resulted, generally, in a 2-3 day hospital stay and no untoward sequalae after 6 weeks. COVID-induced myocarditis has seen numerous deaths and long-term damage to the heart muscle. Cardiologists talking to colleagues and friends don't make this stuff up; there's no benefit in it. NOR do the honest ones make up something readily disproved for publication, because medical science revolves around repeating someone else's studies to be able to verify the results rather than just believing a single study's (or worse, a single center's) results.
Having spent my entire career in science, and a big portion of that in medical research, with publications, AND serving as a reviewer for several journals, I know how this works. It's pretty obvious there are people here who don't possess a clue, nor could they identify one on a good day.
During the course of the pandemic, I rather dispassionately read a few thousand articles critically, virtually always reading them as a reviewer, and submitting questions for elucidation to the authors. Because of the manner and nature of my queries I almost always got replies; the few who didn't reply often had the weaker articles. I analyzed the numbers using a standard epidemiological process without any attempt to edit anything. I reported the numbers as they came out. At least as long as we had sufficient testing infrastructure to have any faith that our sample size was sufficient for valid population data. What I reported was as unbiased as I could possibly make it, mostly due to the fact that I simply fed the same sources' data into my programs and reported the data. In other words my work, like that of virtually all the scientists I've associated with through my career, were the best I could provide without agenda or intent to influence anyone without some basis in science. For the record, I have disagreed with the CDC, mostly during the previous administration, when Redfield was in charge. Walensky inherited a disaster, and made strides in revamping and restoring the system. Cohen has a slightly less damaged landscape to start with but is still having to shape the future with fewer solid tools and senior scientists than when Redfield arrived with a directive to slash the agency, for which we saw a mass exodus of irreplaceable senior science talent. Those who want to slam CDC need to consider this: As with any large institution, it has its problems, but unlike most government agencies, it's mostly apolitical... until an administration starts censoring posts from career scientists and clinicians because they don't conform to the "correct" narrative. CDC is an exemplar for other nations to follow, and has left a positive mark across the world. Disparaging it because someone has a poor opinion but no real interactions professionally is fairly juvenile, but is consistent with a lot of the comments I've seen on Paul Offitt's blog here. And it's in very poor form.
No Israel was first. But military doctors advised FDA in Feb 2021. They were ignored.
The Israeli publication was in June 2021 (note that they use the non-US style of dates, so 2/6/21 is the second of June)
https://www.gov.il/en/departments/news/01062021-03
The FDA issued advisories in June 2021 two weeks later.
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-june-25-2021
Most people have the basic reading skills to see that what you assert isn't true.
I wouldn’t know as I’m not in the USA.
However a google search limited to 1/1/2021 to 30/6/2021 gives this
https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/06/heres-all-the-data-on-myocarditis-cases-linked-to-covid-19-vaccines/
This was one month after the vaccine had been authorised for 12-17 year olds.
Also this
https://publications.aap.org/aapnews/news/17152/CDC-confirms-226-cases-of-myocarditis-after-COVID?autologincheck=redirected
MMWR
Use of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine After Reports of Myocarditis Among Vaccine Recipients: Update from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices — United States, June 2021
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7027e2.htm
Final comment on this. Military doctors in both Finland and the USA did notice a marked rise in mild myocarditis following vaccination, not against CoViD19 but against Smallpox.
Thanks for providing every single fact you have to support your POV!
They knew before they formally published. Reports came out of Israel very quickly.
A number of the early Israeli reports raised serious questions of methodology. It took nearly 6 months for us to sort out some of their processes before we could honestly evaluate their findings. Let's say their work was 'hasty'.
Most people will notice that you just argue by assertion.
Why does Albus’ account not have any subscriptions?
Why aren't you dealing with the facts?
Are you embarrassed by the obvious dishonesty of Sophocles's assertion?
He’s a paid bot. Or he’s a retired school teacher, ergo no one likes him.
Correction: folks that choose to support the anti-vacc fraud don't like facts.
Speaking of facts: over the decade plus.....a number of people have figured out my identity and dropped by on campus for a coffee/chat.
But so far, not one single anti-vacc has been smart enough to figure out who I am.
Yup, the anti-vaccs just aren't smart enough to do such basic research! Which is why they have nothing to offer but lies and personal attacks .
Gotcha, thanks!
They had an RSV vaccine years ago....was pulled from market. 🤔
If you are talking about the first RSV candidate vaccine trial in the 1960s, we learned a lot in 60 years. Besides,never made it to market as it failed in trial.
Pre-fusion F is absent on the surface of formalin-inactivated respiratory syncytial virus
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5040956/
Structure based design worked
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2216358
Nope, the anti vaccs prey upon folks too stupid to read or count.
My children were born in the 1980s, before the explosion of the “recommended” vaccine schedule. Kids back then were SO much healthier than today’s kids. I see it in my grandkids and it breaks my heart. Allergies, eczema, frequent illness not to mention explosions of ASD and ADHD today. The natural God-given immune system is being destroyed by constant introduction of man-made products. Parents need to wake up and follow the money because that’s where they will find “The Science”.
The same immune system that in the 1800 that prevented death in 537.11 out of 10000 child by age 5? Meaning that 462.89 children died by age 5 in the 1800?
Please explain:
1. the data showing that immune systems are being destroyed by vaccines.
2. the fact that health insurance companies/national health care systems all find vaccinated kids to be healthier than unvaccinated.
Do your own research
I have.
Your assertions are indefensible...that is why you can't defend them.
I can defend them but I will not waste my time on someone who is so brainwashed by the current system.
No you can’t!
Read these books and then come back.
Turtles All The Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth https://a.co/d/cuwA7FH
Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History https://a.co/d/hMfpEvu
Go see Dr John Campbell.
Why? He’s not even a medical doctor. He’s just a kook who’s fallen for audience capture, so he churns out antivax propaganda that he’s able to make a lot of money from.
He’s spent most of his life teaching nurses and knows very well how the NHS works. He’s not the only one there plenty of data crunchers doing the work. You feel to me like you just want to crush everything around you rather than being open and willing. If you know so much share your valuable
Resources.
The fact he has taught nursing students doesn’t mean he hasn’t fallen down the rabbit hole…he clearly has.
And I’ve spent my professional life teaching doctors, btw.
Not true. 1: if you search (not censored google) for data from Malone, kirsch, McCullough and more, you can find loads of data that show the jab has affected the T cell line of your immune system. It’s why rare and aggressive cancers have exploded (you can look that up too)
Also, Look at Dr Paul Thomas’s data and stats. You can YouTube it. It’s quite the opposite.
Do your own research that’s NOT MSM. CNN, msnbc, etc
Thanks for the late reply.
So post an example or two of this data.
I am guessing that it will be complete BS....and probably on a topic that you don't have any training in.....
So no you don’t care what the facts are.
The data is collected.
Also, when you work in a hospital and hear Code Strokes called all day. Not to mention the #diedsuddenly ‘s. But what is so tragic is the rise in spontaneous abortions. With no access to vax records, I can’t make actual connections. People with eyes and half a brain can make connections though.
Covid causes miscarriage. There’s been a pandemic. No wonder you’ve seen a rise in cases.
So why would you choose to get the same poison by shot that is the virus thus increasing the amount of poison that might not ever disappear as was promised? It was not supposed to go to every organ in your body. Why do you keep believing when they have lied about everything?
There are no poisons in the vaccines.
Why can’t you get the most basic facts correct?
The amount of MRNA and spike protein getting into the systemic circulation after vaccination is tiny. IIRC, around 0.009% ended up in the ovaries, for example.
People that understand 5 th grade science see your error.
Strange that no matter how many times it gets explained you still don’t get it!
Please don’t get any more shots. I apologize for begging you to get shots. I don’t want you to die.
You should apologize for many things. Including your innumerate posting about spontaneous abortions.
Unreal. CDC is captured.
Real---you offered nothing but argument by assertion.
It’s the BOT again from Corporate Headquarters.
Oh look, personal attacks....but you still haven't offered a rational thought or a single piece of data.
The mask?
If you wish to post, could you at least make an effort to be coherent...even if basic reason isn't possible.....
If you insist. https://open.substack.com/pub/davidblackwellrnbsnccm/p/the-school-boards?r=17w9ym&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
https://open.substack.com/pub/gregreese/p/white-house-knew-covid-vaccines-were?r=pequg&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
Thanks for the substack....again....
"White House Knew COVID Vaccines Were Killing People Over Two Years Ago"
Please quote the exact section of the e-mails that demonstrate this.
Thanks,
Hi Albus,
Please do your own work. Eyes on your own paper and no cheating! And then go get another shot!
Thanks for acknowledging that you posted a substack that lies and counts on folks to be too clueless to read.
Disgusting and evil to give this to pregnant women. A warning to all to what happens when eugenics and science mix.
You clearly are unaware the reason this is given to pregnant women is to stop their babies dying of RSV.
Do you want babies to die? Who here is “disgusting and evil” exactly?
Thanks for providing every single fact, piece of data, and logic that you support your delusional claims.
Would you read it? I don't think you will. You have a mindset that vaccines work and are life saving and you will not be deterred from that. If you are really open to this then I suggest you read Turtles All The Way Down Vaccine Science and Myth which was written anonymously by two Israeli scientists.
https://www.amazon.com/Turtles-All-Way-Down-Vaccine/dp/9655981045
Sorry, missed your comment.
I have read the Turtles book--and I pulled some of the references.
If I give you some examples where it obviously lied--will you read the words and condemn the lies?
We are slowly depleting and altering our innate immune systems. Post and MODERN Vaccine solutions have gone way too far, no longer serving the "Greater Good" please Dr. think farward by looking back.
Please provide the data that we are depleting/altering our innate immune system.
You seriously need to do further research. I don’t know how your missing the data on the millions affected for life by the shots and the hundreds of thousands if not millions of deaths directly related to the shots. Just saying.
So no, you’ve got nothing to offer..
I have done the needed research.
I have also proven here how the assertion that the shots have killed thousands/millions is a flat out lie and that simply use of 5th grade math proves it is a lie.
All I have gotten so far from the anti-vaccs is lots of name-calling, but zero willingness to even try and get the facts right.
Maybe you will be the first?
I expect to be off line for the next ~ 2weeks, but the evidence is already posted here at Dr. Offit's substack...if you are willing to look.
Most people who get the Covid™ jab won't die, just like most people who eat sugar won't die.
But your health risks are increased in both scenarios.
My childhood dentist used to say: Eat sugar and support your local dentist! Remember big pHarma does not want to cure you... nor do your docs who are bought and paid for.
Go get your shotssssss!
So no you don’t care that your claims are lies predicated on folks being too stupid to count!
The risks are not increased. I have already proved that is a lie.
Hello Albus!
Thank-you for your question and comment. Maybe I will be the first!
Many "Anti-Vac" are more "Intuitives" then they are researchers, so in that sense I agree with your statement. Most have gone through the "Rabbit Hole" one way or another and at some point simply begin to trust their alternative media news sources. I am not an "Anti" anything. I am however stubborn enough to be a skeptic. So, I force myself to always listen to both sides of the various debates going on. That is one the reasons I am here reading Dr. Offit's substack. I follow many others...John Campbell, Dr. Mobean, Ed Dowd, Dr.Prasad,Darkhorse, Dr.Dhan just to name a few. BTW most of these experts have gone down the rabbit hole at the same time.
Are you willing to go down that rabbit hole (respectfully) as I did? If so, it would be my pleasure to engage.
Guess that means no you aren’t willing to look at the facts !
I am willing.
Are you willing to accept the possibility you have been lied too?
How sad that scientists are involved in tbis racket.
Hmmmmm....a fact/argument free posting
Maternal antibodies passively cross the placenta and provide a critical source of immunity to newborns before their immune systems are mature enough to respond to pathogens. Additional maternal antibodies are transmitted after birth in mother's milk from breast-feeding. Because RSV infection causes severe infections to the youngest of infants and babies, passive transfer of antibodies specific to RSV is beneficial. This is why vaccines were developed to stimulate maternal production of anti-RSV antibodies at the end of gestation. If there are side effects (including increased premature births) these will be noted in large population studies post-FDA licensure. Then a pregnant woman and her obstetrician can weigh the costs and benefits of those risks.
None of that has been proven... literally speculation
You didn’t read any of the studies—did you?
While post vaccine studies are needed, those pregnant women that choose to be vaccinated may have certain traits that are different from women that don’t choose to be vaccinated. More RCT’s are needed. Preferably by an independent scientist.
We’re all just lab rats for these snake oil salesmen. Human life has no value unless drugs can be sold.
Dr. Offit. You are reckless in your determinations. As the parent of 2 vaccine injured children, one of whom I walked out of non-verbal autism with functional medicine protocols, I am appalled at your ignorance and expect far better from someone academically trained to look at ALL the data. Why do you think it’s ok to sacrifice the next generation when we CLEARLY have an issue with our youth and autism. What do you supposed happens to our country when everyone has some sort of autoimmune disease. Once upon a time, antibiotics we the “miracle” until is was overused. Why on earth would vaccination be any different. I do pray for your soul sir, bc I think the harm you’ve reaped on the most vulnerable in our society is egoism at it’s worst.
How dare you make the world your lab rats without any consideration for the harm you are supporting. Shame on you and every doctor who can’t read all the data .
You use personal attacks and censorship because with a tiny effort the bio med scam is obvious!
I think if I were trying to counsel someone about this I would favor the nirsevimab option, or the vaccine at 35-36 weeks. I would definitely do one or the other.
Probably not enough maternal morbidity with RSV to worry about studying the beneficial effects of vaccination for the mother? Yet this quote i found was shocking and would seem inflated, but another reason to favor vaccination:
“Indeed, a prospective study reported that 50% of RSV-positive pregnant women developed a severe infection requiring more than 3 days of hospitalization, and 40% of them was diagnosed as having pneumonia. Interestingly, preterm birth occurred more frequently in RSV-positive pregnant women when compared to RSV-negative controls. Also, complications were more frequent with third trimester infections (59). In a more recent study, authors showed that 10 out of 20 pregnant women with RSV infection were hospitalized for pneumonia, atelectasis, respiratory failure, or sepsis (60), and 9 of them had at least one comorbid condition such as asthma, obesity, or co-infection. Again, 9 out of 10 pregnant women were hospitalized during the third trimester of pregnancy, a period in which major physiologic changes occur in the maternal respiratory and immune systems. It should be noted that the true incidence of RSV infection in pregnancy might be underdiagnosed due to infrequent testing.”
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2022.853009/full#:~:text=Yearly%20reinfections%20are%20frequent%20because,lead%20to%20adverse%20perinatal%20outcomes.
That hospitalization rate seems really high me, so I’m sure that a lot of mild cases of RSV were not being included in the denominator. Yet like most infections in pregnancy, mothers are at higher risk.
Also there is evidence of vertical (mother to baby) transmission of RSV during pregnancy, which increases the development of of asthma and airway hyperreactivity in utero:
https://consultqd.clevelandclinic.org/prenatal-exposure-respiratory-syncytial-virus-found-alter-postnatal-immunity/amp/
So maybe favor the vaccine if third trimester during RSV season, both for mother and baby?
Thanks for the summary. I'd wondered about the change from 24 to 32 weeks but had not had time to delve into this.
If I read this right, concerns about premature birth influenced this change.
So I saw, but the last 3 weeks haven't been conducive to doing the necessary reading on my part. That's why I liked his summary.
Guys come on.
All figures are available just go look at Dr John Cambells YT or on SS - as well as all the GVT sites worldwide, although they are very slow to come out hmmm. Llatest excess deaths a disaster not spoken about in MSM and you’ll see straight away that @BethNotKaren has a good point. Interested to hear though what @KB thinks of the nano tech dots we ALL have in our blood now from such shots..... even if we didn’t have them, tested and found in rain water, food, ther meds including insulin and anaesthetics. Horror! Interested to hear what how you feel about being “frequency” zapped and therefore mind/ body controlled by the powers that be... our trusted governments?
I’d rather hear what one of the world’s most admired infectious disease and vaccine experts says about this than listen to a non-scientist on his YouTube videos.
But please, tell us more about the phenomenon of being “frequency zapped” for mind control and the “nanotech dots” we have had injected with the vaccines. I’m all ears.
I’m also confused about what you term the “excess death disaster”.
Last time I looked, excess deaths were still declining globally.
https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/coronavirus-data-explorer?tab=map&time=2020-10-26&country=USA~BRA~JPN~DEU&Metric=Excess+mortality+%28estimates%29&Interval=7-day+rolling+average&Relative+to+Population=true&Color+by+test+positivity=false
There’s also fantastic data analysis on Substack with updated figures and mathematical interrogation which is easy to find. There’s obviously way more available on all resources across internet. Algorithms are probably sending you to the misinformation sadly. Step outside the matrix a bit.... just for fun and the treasures you will find. I sincerely hope you can. The more of us genuinely trying to find the answers get there in the end. It’s not meant to be easy.
Please visit some excellent researchers here on Substack, to start off at least...
Dr Ana Mihalcea there’s plenty more scientists following with repeatedly stacked evidence re nanotechnology miraculously finding its way into all bloods (humans) now. Tread gently and be kind to yourself, it’s not for the faint hearted and demands courage on all levels to continue researching.
Dr Zac Bush (Biologist) highlights the chemical changes occurring in the mind/ body in response to the “inks” the plethora of artificial chemicals, metals and DNA and then you could move onto
Dr Bryan Ardis on his in-depth research of what the virus actually is/was. It circulates in the air and water so it’s everywhere now. There’s so much research on this by eminent scientists etc.
There are soooo many resources to delve into from scientists holding Noble Laureates, peer reviewed scientists, virologists, biologists, surgeons, doctors, real humans affected by this chemical bioweapon.... which is actually stated on Pfizer’s MRNA patent, bla bla bla bla theres endless eveidence.
open BOTH eyes and just then maybe you will jump start that 3rd eye of yours which will unlock the door to truth. It’s all there for us if we choose to “see” it. It’s all there in plain sight.
Good idea to listen to different POV.
If you then listen to actual scientists, they clearly explain how not a scientist Cambell gets ~everything wrong.
BTW: bad old MSM has reported quite a bit about how the excess deaths facts have been grossly misrepresented by the anti-vaccs.
The Albus has spoken: a real scientist is one with whom Albus agrees.
Note you still refuse to even try and get the facts correct.
Note: You didn’t say—this is life and death so I will at least listen to actual scientists.
Yes, awesome. Now do the same for “Jursy gurl” if you would.
You can’t even spell.
🤣🤣🤣awesome
Of your goal was to demonstrate how the anti-vaccs have no morals!
In theory you could try dealing with the topics here and the facts…
Mr. Albus,
You are being paid or you have been played. Sad options. Get your shots and good luck!
Nope, you are just making up things because you know that qualified folks know Cambell is selling BS.
The cdc, fda, and the total government agencies have lost all respect and trust.
Glad to hear it. You’ll be supporting efforts to negate the effects of the pandemic through vaccination and treatment then.
It’s interesting, when I read the study I thought of it as premature birth a month after the injection does not make physiologic sense. We consider other adverse reactions more than a month later unlikely to be related, this one wasn’t statistically significant and seems unlikely. That said the answer is to either get it closer to delivery or use beyfortus. I am just so excited as a pediatrician to offer parents options.
What a pile of horse💩, if the mother breast feeds she will pass on natural immunity no need for anything else. How on earth did mothers do yrs ago when there wasn’t any immunisations and both children and adults were not as healthy as they are today. I know as I’m from a family of nine. With none of this nonsense.
What happened years ago is that 3 out of every 5 kids didn’t reach the age of 5 because they died from infectious disease.
Welcome to the wonders of modern medicine and hygiene.
Easy, historically lots of kids got sick and died.
Can you really not do the math?