Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Evelyn Duvivier's avatar

Dr. Offit is an excellent communicator of health information. I have read many of his books, support the Vaccine Education Center at his hospital, and appreciated his voice of reason during the height of the Covid pandemic.

However, Pfizer's April 2024 study of Paxlovid was NEGATIVE. There was no significant difference in hospitalization or deaths in the two groups: high risk unvaccinated or low risk vaccinated. There was one death from any cause in the 317 high risk unvaccinated people which does not meet statistical significance; it was chance. There were 10 (1.6%) placebo vs 5 (0.8%) Paxlovid hospitalization but this also was not shown, by the study, to have been due to Paxlovid. Statistically, it was as likely due to chance and the authors acknowledge this: "The results with respect to the number of Covid-19 related hospitalization and deaths from any cause, ALTHOUGH NOT SIGNIFICANT..."

This paper is an excellent example of the necessity of randomized controlled trials (RCT). Observational trials can suggest hypotheses but a RCT is essential as, well designed, it avoids bias.

Pfizer's April 2024 paper, try at they may to spin in their favor, was a NEGATIVE trial. It failed to show that Paxlovid decreases death, hospitalization, or duration of symptoms.

Expand full comment
Lumi's avatar

Thank you very much for showing the value of Paxlovid as an antiviral treatment !

Expand full comment
114 more comments...

No posts